Waubonsee Community College

Freedom of speech and the function of rhetoric in the United States, Michael Donnelly

Label
Freedom of speech and the function of rhetoric in the United States, Michael Donnelly
Language
eng
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 83-89) and index
Index
index present
Literary Form
non fiction
Main title
Freedom of speech and the function of rhetoric in the United States
Nature of contents
bibliography
Oclc number
967148865
Responsibility statement
Michael Donnelly
Summary
Freedom of speech is a major component of the cultural context in which we live, think, work, and write, generally revered as the foundation of true democracy. But the issue has a great deal more to do with social organizations generally, and in a democratic society specifically. The dominant, liberal notion of free speech in the United States, assumed to be self-evidently true, is, in fact, a particular historical and cultural formation, rooted in Enlightenment philosophies and dependent on a collection of false narratives about the founding of the country, the role of speech and media in its development, and the relationship between capitalism and democracy. Most importantly, this notion of freedom of speech relies on a warped sense of the function of rhetoric in democratic social organization. By privileging individual expression at the expense of democratic deliberation, the liberal notion of free speech functions largely to suppress rather than promote meaningful public discussion and debate and works to sustain unequal relations of power. The presumed democratization of the public sphere, via the Internet, raises more questions than it answers: who has access and who doesn't, who commands attention and why, and what sorts of effects such expression actually has. We need to think a great deal more carefully about the values subsumed and ignored in an uncritical attachment to a particular version of the public sphere. Freedom of Speech and the Function of Rhetoric in the United States seeks to illuminate the ways in which cultural framing diminishes the complexity of free speech and sublimates a range of value choices. A more fully democratic society requires a more critical view of freedom of speech. -- from back cover
Table Of Contents
Introduction : the function of rhetoric at the present time -- Freedom of speech in the United States -- Publicness and models of the public sphere -- Parrhesia and/in the democratic state -- Freedom of speech in the twentieth century -- Free speech and hate speech in the age of the Internet
Classification
Content
Mapped to