Bibliograph

Arbitrary and capricious, the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the death penalty, Michael A. Foley

Type

Label

Arbitrary and capricious, the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the death penalty, Michael A. Foley

Language

eng

Bibliography note

Includes bibliographical references and index

Index

index present

Literary Form

non fiction

Main title

Arbitrary and capricious

Nature of contents

bibliography

Oclc number

51655357

Responsibility statement

Michael A. Foley

Review

"Nearly 100 influential Supreme Court capital punishment-related cases from 1878-2002 are examined, beginning with Wilkerson v. Utah, which question not the legitimacy of capital punishment, but the methods of execution. Over time, focus shifted from the constitutionality of certain methods to the fairness of who was being sentenced for capital crimes - and why. The watershed 1972 ruling Furman v. Georgia reversed the Court's stand on capital punishment, holding that the arbitrary and capricious imposition of the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment, and therefore unconstitutional

Sub title

the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the death penalty

Summary

Furman clarified that any new death penalty legislation must contain sentencing procedures that avoid the arbitrary infliction of a life-ending verdict, which led to the current complex tangle of issues surrounding the death penalty and its constitutional viability."--Jacket

Classification

Creator